Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2218/2026 of SMT EDARA SARADADEVI @ SARADAMBA Vs K PRATAP SIVA KISHORE IPS on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2218/2026 Between: 1. SMT EDARA SARADADEVI @ SARADAMBA, W/O EDARA VENKATA RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O
APHC010316502026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2218/2026
Between:
1. SMT EDARA SARADADEVI @ SARADAMBA, W/O EDARA VENKATA
RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O SURAPAVARIGUDEM
VILLAGE, H/O BUTTAYAGUDEM VILLAGE 85 MAND, WEST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. K PRATAP SIVA KISHORE IPS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. DURGA MAHESWARA RAO, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUTTAYAGUDEM POLICE STATION, BUTTAYAGUDEM, ELURU
DISTRICT ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit this Honble Court may be pleased to invoke the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against Respondents for their wilful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in W.P. No. 10159 of 2025 and consequently punish them in accordance with law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SEEPANI S KUMAR
2.
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2218 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and that FIR No.88 of 2025 was registered on 04.09.2025. He further submits that no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. The said submission is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.10.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.2218 of 2026 Date: 08.10.2026
KGM