Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2164/2026 of D.Khader Vail, Vs Sri. Peeyush Kumar, I.A.S., on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2164/2026 Between: 1. D.KHADER VALI,, S/O D.SULTHAN SAHEB, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, DR.NO.3/887, SANTHI
APHC010274752026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2164/2026
Between:
1. D.KHADER VALI,, S/O D.SULTHAN SAHEB, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC.
CONTRACTOR, DR.NO.3/887, SANTHI NAGAR, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAL DISTRICT (FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM
DISTRICT) ANDHRA PRADESH-515671
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT,
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522238.
2. SRI P VENKATA RAMANAIAH COMMISSIONER, DHARMAVARAM
MUNCIPALITY, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
(FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT)515001.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, deliberately, violating and not implementing the orders of the Honble High Court passed in WP. No. 30259
of 2025, Dt. 04.11.2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2164 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30259 of 2025, dated 04.11.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.10.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.2164 of 2026 Date: 08.10.2026
KGM