Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2985/2026 of Smt. K. Chimini Bai, Vs Ram Prakash Sisodia, on 7 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 8 th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2985/2026 Between: 1. SMT. K. CHIMINI BAI,, W/O. K. SUDHAKAR NAIDU, AGED 80 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-325,

APHC010359052026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2985/2026

Between:

1. SMT. K. CHIMINI BAI,, W/O. K. SUDHAKAR NAIDU, AGED 80 YEARS, R/O.

D.NO.5-325, GAYATRI NAGAR, OPP. MAHILA VISHWA VIDYALAYAM, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. RAM

PRAKASH

SISODIA,

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

REVENUE

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 238.

2. DR S VENKATESWAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517

503.

3. B RAMA MOHAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE

DIVISION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT -517 502.

4. JANARDHAN RAJU, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, CHANDRAGIRI

MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT -517 101.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them for violation of the orders of this Honble court in W.P.No.28440/2025 dated 30.10.2025 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SUDEEPTHI POTLURI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

CONTEMPT CASE No.2985 of 2026

ORDER:

This Court, vide order dated 30.10.2025 in W.P.No.28440 of 2025, directed the respondents to examine the petition dated 10.03.2025 filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

2. For non compliance of the said order, the present Contempt Case is filed.

3. Sri Bhagat Singh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, furnished compliance report dated 07.10.2026. As seen from the report it appears that the Joint Collector-cum-Settlement Officer, Tirupati, is directed to grant ryotwari patta in favour of the petitioner, in accordance with the orders of the Director of Settlements dated 09.08.2000, in R.P.No.19/98(H1), as upheld by the Commissioner of Appeals and take necessary action for incorporation of the petitioner’s name in the relevant revenue records.

4. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, nothing remains the contempt case to adjudicate further.

5. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 08.10.2026 KBN

Contempt Case No.2985 of 2026

08.10.2026 KBN

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead