Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1815/2026 of VENNA KASI REDDY Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS on 7 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1815/2026 Between: 1. VENNA KASI REDDY, S/O. KASI REDDY AGE 35 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR R/O. D. NO. 4-59,

APHC010207552026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1815/2026

Between:

1. VENNA KASI REDDY, S/O. KASI REDDY AGE 35 YEARS, OCC

CONTRACTOR R/O. D. NO. 4-59, RAMACHANDRA KOTA VILLAGE

DORNALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523331.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND

PLANNING

DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT

,VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238.

2. SRI S RAVI KUMAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (R AND B)

CIRCLE ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523001.

3. SRI T SRINIVASA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (R AND B), MARKAPUR PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523316.

4. SRI K GANESH KUMAR, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND

B), SUB-DIVISION, MARKAPUR PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523316

5. SRI SHAIK SHABEER, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND

B), YERRAGONDAPALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523327.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 20.01.2026 passed in W.P. No. 27910 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

2. Y BALAJI

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

CONTEMPT CASE No.1815 of 2026

ORDER:

Both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, in unison, represented and stated that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 08.10.2026 KBN

Contempt Case No.1815 of 2026

08.10.2026 KBN

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead