Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/211/2020 of Kesana Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 211/2020 Between: 1. KESANA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SRI K.RANGA RAO,HINDU,AGED 45YRS,R/O KESANAVARIPALLEM
APHC010089642020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 211/2020
Between:
1. KESANA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SRI K.RANGA RAO,HINDU,AGED
45YRS,R/O
KESANAVARIPALLEM
VILLAGE,H/O
CHTRAGADDA,REPALLR MANDAL,GUNTUR DIST
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP
2. M NAGA LAKSHMI, R/O KESANAVARIPALEM VILLAGE CRIME NO
152 OF 2009 OF REPALLE POLICE STATION GUNTUR DISTRICT R2
IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE HON'BLE COURT ORDER DT
1/10/2026.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. TURAGA SAI SURYA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SAIDULU SHAIK
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, learned Legal Aid Counsel for Respondent No.2 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
2. The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present.
3. Smt. K. Parvathi, learned Counsel, is appointed as Mediator in this case. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the learned Mediator conducted the mediation proceedings and submitted his report. The said report is hereby accepted.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1 and K. Bharathi Devi v. State of Telangana2, and having regard to the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that it would be in the interest of justice, the proceedings are quashed in view of the settlement. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of compromised.
5. Consequently, the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Repalle, in C.C.No.314 of 2009, dated 16.10.2017, and confirmed by the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali, in Crl.A.No.427 of 2017, dated 25.02.2020, are hereby quashed. There shall be no order as to costs.
1 2012(10) SCC 303 2 (2024) 10 SCC 384
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO,J Date :08.10.2026 KMS
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 211 of 2020
Date: 08.10.2026
KMS