Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/8806/2024 of P. PRUDHVI RAJ Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8806/2024 Between: 1. P. PRUDHVI RAJ, S/O. VIJAYARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 2-56-1, MERLAPALEM VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, DR

APHC010166872024

IN THE H

(

WEDNESDA

THE HONOURAB

WRIT

Between:

1. P. PRUDHVI RAJ, S/O

R/O. H.NO. 2-56-1,

MANDAL, DR BR AM

1. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY ROAD

SECRETARIAT, VELA

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY,

VELAGAPUDI, AMA

DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT CO

GODAVARI DISTRICT

4. THE CHIEF ENGINE

N.T.R., DISTRICT.

5. THE SUPERINTEND

ELURU, ELURU DIST

6. THE EXECUTIVE E

BHIMAVARAM, WES

W.P.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

T PETITION NO: 8806/2024

O. VIJAYARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 3

MERLAPALEM VILLAGE, ATREY

MBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.

...PE

AND

NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P

DS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPA

AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR

NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P

FINANCE

DEPARTMENT,

SECR

ARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL,

LLECTOR R AND B, BHIMAVARAM

T.

EER R AND B DEPARTMENT, VIJA

ING ENGINEER R AND B, R AND B

TRICT.

NGINEER R AND B, (R AND B)

ST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

RC,J

No.8806 of 2024

ATI

33 YEARS,

YAPURAM

TITIONER

PRINCIPLE

ARTMENT,

MANDAL,

PRINCIPAL

RETARIAT,

GUNTUR

M, WEST

AYAWADA,

B CIRCLE,

DIVISION,

RC,J

W.P.No.8806 of 2024

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing total payment of Rs.

1,43,43,113/- i.e., 1) Amount of Rs. 9,94,444/-, vide M. Book No. 1446, 2)

Amount of Rs. 1,97,848/-, vide M. Book No. 1065, 3) Amount of Rs.

6,67,106/-, vide M. Book No. 795, 4) Amount of Rs. 28,65,581/-, vide M. Book No. 246, 5) Amount of Rs. 28,32,695/-, vide M. Book No. 1050, 6) Amount of Rs. 13,97,661/-, vide M. Book No. 542, 7) Amount of Rs. 6,57,070/-, vide M.

Book No. 6355, 8) Amount of Rs. 5,45,144/-, vide M. Book No. 895, 9)

Amount of Rs. 3,42,453/-, vide M. Book No.958, 10) Amount of Rs. 5,03,415/- , vide M. Book No. 1341, 11) Amount of Rs. 4,48,485/-, vide M. Book No.

553, 12) Amount of Rs. 9,67,549/-, vide M. Book No. 805, 13) Amount of Rs.

19,22,662/-, vide M. Book No. 1351, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14

and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 1,43,43,113/- for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs.

1,43,43,113/-, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)

RC,J

W.P.No.8806 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri K.Srinivasa, learned counsel, representing Sri Annamneedi Bala Krishna, learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 7th October, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead