Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8806/2024 of P. PRUDHVI RAJ Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8806/2024 Between: 1. P. PRUDHVI RAJ, S/O. VIJAYARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 2-56-1, MERLAPALEM VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, DR
APHC010166872024
IN THE H
(
WEDNESDA
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
1. P. PRUDHVI RAJ, S/O
R/O. H.NO. 2-56-1,
MANDAL, DR BR AM
1. THE STATE OF AN
SECRETARY ROAD
SECRETARIAT, VELA
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF AN
SECRETARY,
VELAGAPUDI, AMA
DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT CO
GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE CHIEF ENGINE
N.T.R., DISTRICT.
5. THE SUPERINTEND
ELURU, ELURU DIST
6. THE EXECUTIVE E
BHIMAVARAM, WES
W.P.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
T PETITION NO: 8806/2024
O. VIJAYARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 3
MERLAPALEM VILLAGE, ATREY
MBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.
...PE
AND
NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P
DS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPA
AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR
NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECR
ARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL,
LLECTOR R AND B, BHIMAVARAM
T.
EER R AND B DEPARTMENT, VIJA
ING ENGINEER R AND B, R AND B
TRICT.
NGINEER R AND B, (R AND B)
ST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
RC,J
No.8806 of 2024
ATI
33 YEARS,
YAPURAM
TITIONER
PRINCIPLE
ARTMENT,
MANDAL,
PRINCIPAL
RETARIAT,
GUNTUR
M, WEST
AYAWADA,
B CIRCLE,
DIVISION,
RC,J
W.P.No.8806 of 2024
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing total payment of Rs.
1,43,43,113/- i.e., 1) Amount of Rs. 9,94,444/-, vide M. Book No. 1446, 2)
Amount of Rs. 1,97,848/-, vide M. Book No. 1065, 3) Amount of Rs.
6,67,106/-, vide M. Book No. 795, 4) Amount of Rs. 28,65,581/-, vide M. Book No. 246, 5) Amount of Rs. 28,32,695/-, vide M. Book No. 1050, 6) Amount of Rs. 13,97,661/-, vide M. Book No. 542, 7) Amount of Rs. 6,57,070/-, vide M.
Book No. 6355, 8) Amount of Rs. 5,45,144/-, vide M. Book No. 895, 9)
Amount of Rs. 3,42,453/-, vide M. Book No.958, 10) Amount of Rs. 5,03,415/- , vide M. Book No. 1341, 11) Amount of Rs. 4,48,485/-, vide M. Book No.
553, 12) Amount of Rs. 9,67,549/-, vide M. Book No. 805, 13) Amount of Rs.
19,22,662/-, vide M. Book No. 1351, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14
and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 1,43,43,113/- for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs.
1,43,43,113/-, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)
RC,J
W.P.No.8806 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri K.Srinivasa, learned counsel, representing Sri Annamneedi Bala Krishna, learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 7th October, 2026.
RR