Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP(PIL)/156/2026 of PATTAN MOHAMMED ALI KHAN Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 156 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-26 [3584] Pattan Mohammed Ali Khan ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondent(s) ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 7th October, 2026. Present
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010349772026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WP(PIL) NO: 156 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-26
Pattan Mohammed Ali Khan ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondent(s) ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 7th October, 2026. Present : Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. G. Krishna Kireeti for Mr. G. Sri Harsha Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. Vankayalapati N Praveen, (SC for GNT,ONG,NLR Municipal Corporations) – R2 LISA GILL, CJ:
Prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to respondent No.2 to remove unauthorized constructions made on walking track covering drainage at Ponnur Road, Guntur, Guntur District.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2, referring to written instructions received from Commissioner, Guntur Municipal Corporation, submits that, as recorded in order dated 10.09.2026, all encroachments mentioned in writ petition have been removed and therefore, writ petition is rendered infructuous.
HCJ & CGRJ WP(PIL)_156_2026
3. Learned counsel for petitioner on 10.09.2026 had shown a photograph of a purported encroachment which still existed and had sought time to file an affidavit along with relevant documents, besides seek instructions.
4. Needful has not been done till date.
5. Learned counsel for respondents, at this stage, informs that photographs which were shown on the last date of hearing are of a liquor shop constructed on private patta land and not on government land though building permission has not been obtained. Necessary action in that regard is also being taken in accordance with law.
6. Keeping in view facts and circumstances as above, we do not find any justification for continuation of present proceedings, which are accordingly closed, with liberty to petitioner to file an appropriate application before respondent No.2, in case of any other encroachments coming to his notice.
No costs. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. LISA GILL, CJ.
CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J. SSN Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned
: Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable
: Yes / No