Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/3558/2023 of K V RAMANA REDDY Vs THE GOVERNMENT OF AP on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 3558/2023 Between: 1. K V RAMANA REDDY, S/O.MALLA REDDY AGED 61 YEARS, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (NOW

APHC010072152023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

WRIT PETITION NO: 3558/2023

Between:

1. K V RAMANA REDDY, S/O.MALLA REDDY AGED 61 YEARS, SUB

INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (NOW COMPULSORY RETIRED) WEST

GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME

(SER.II)

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

AP,VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE

DEPUTY

INSPECTOR

GENERAL

OF

POLICE,

ELURU

RANGE,ELURU

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order more in the nature of Mandamus, to the declare the action of the 3rd respondent in continuing the disciplinary proceedings through Memo No317/P/2010 dated 19.02.2011 and the subsequent dissent note Memo No1706374/Ser.II/A1/2022 dated 06.12.2022, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, Violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution Of India, as well as in breach of principles of natural justice, and consequentially set aside the disciplinary proceedings through Memo No317/P/2010 dated 19.02.2011 of the 3rd respondent and the subsequent 1 st respondent dissent note Memo No1706374/Ser.II/A1/2022 dated 06.12.2022, on the ground of delay and latches, charges held not proved, discharged I the criminal case, against GO Ms.No 91GAD (SER-C) Dated 12.09.2022,as well as judgments of the AP High Court and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to SUSPEND all further proceedings arising out of 1st respondent dissent note Memo No:1706374/Ser.II/A1/2022 dated: 06.12.2022, and pass such other orders or orders.

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated:15.03.2023 in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.P.No.3558 of 2023 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K R SRINIVAS

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:

“…to issue a Writ or Order more in the nature of Mandamus, to the declare the action of the 3rd respondent in continuing the disciplinary proceedings through Memo No317/P/2010 dated 19.02.2011 and the subsequent dissent note Memo No1706374/Ser.II/A1/2022 dated 06.12.2022, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, Violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution Of India, as well as in breach of principles of natural justice, and consequentially set aside the disciplinary proceedings through Memo No317/P/2010 dated 19.02.2011 of the 3rd respondent and the subsequent 1st respondent dissent note Memo No1706374/Ser.II/A1/2022 dated 06.12.2022, on the ground of delay and latches, charges held not proved, discharged I the criminal case, against G.O.Ms.No.91GAD (SER-C) Dated 12.09.2022,as well as judgments of the AP High Court and pass such…”

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is no more and the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Hence, he requests this Court to close this Writ Petition.

3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dated: 07.10.2026 M K K

Writ Petition No. 3558 of 2023 Date: 07.10.2026

M K K

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead