Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/8690/2026 of Pangi Rambabu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

.V9 APHC010517592026 ■■,3: \IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 7**" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8690 OF 2026 Between: 1. Pangi Rambabu, S/o. Krishna, aged about 29 years, R/o. Devarapalli

■'<S

a?

-o\

.V9

APHC010517592026

■■,3:\

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

WEDNESDAY, THE 7**" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8690 OF 2026

Between:

1. Pangi Rambabu, S/o. Krishna, aged about 29 years, R/o. Devarapalli Village, Kokkirapalli Post, G. Madugula Mandal, Alluri Sitbarama Raju District.

2. Pangi Anjibabu, S/o. Krishna, aged about 37 years, R/o. Devarapalli Village, Kokkirapalli Post, G. Madugula Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District.

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1, 2

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

...Respondent

Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C/ 480 & 483 of BNSS., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused N0.I, 2 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.361/2021

of Parawada P.S., Anakapalli District;

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.

GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO, Counsel for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR for the Respondent;

The Court made the following ORDER:

Dr.YLR.J

Crl.PNo.8690 of 2026

Dated 07.10.2026

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 on bail in Crime No.361 of 2021 of Parawada Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity 'the NDPS Act’).

2. Mr.G.Maheswara Rao, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent of the alleged offence. They have been falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that the Petitioners are the sole earning members of the family and, therefore, their incarceration would cause undue hardship to their dependents. They are law-abiding citizens. The Petitioners undertake to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, it is urged to allow the Petition.

3. Per contra, Mr.A.Sai Rohith, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioners, submitting that the investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be examined. It is contended that if the Petitioners are released on bail at this stage, there is a strong likelihood that they may abscond, thereby hampering the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law and urged to dismiss the Petition.

Dr. YLR.J Crl..PNo.8690 of 2026 Dated 07.10 2026 Heard the learned counsel Jor the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. On perusal of the record, the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 2 apprehended on 31.03.2026 and has been in judicial custody for the past 190 days. The police found that in an abandoned auto, 112.00 kgs of Ganja kept. However, the charge sheet has not yet been filed, even after the expiry of the statutory period of 180 days. The prosecution has not filed application seeking extension of the period of remand of the petitioners.

6. The petitioners are the permanent resident of Alluri Sitharama Raju District and have got fixed abode. If the petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to stringent conditions, there is no likelihood of his absconding, threatening the witnesses, tampering with the evidence or hampering the further course of investigation. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the period of incarceration undergone by them and the stage of investigation, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 on bail, subject to certain stringent conditions. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent

4.

5. were was any

7.

8. conditions; i. The and shall enlarged on bail subject to their executing a bond for a 30,t)00/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand onjy) be sum of Rs: each

Dr.YLR,J CrI.RNo. 8690 of 2026 Dated 07 10.2026 with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli.

ii. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10;00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet,

iii. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned, iv. The and shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence while on bail. V. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in further investigation of the case and shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. vi. The and shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court.

Dr.YLR.J Crl.RNo.8690 of 2026 Dated 07.10.2026

vii. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall surrender their passports, if any, to the Investigating Officer. If they claim that they do not have passports, they shall submit affidavits to that effect to the Investigating Officer. SD/- U.SRIDEVI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To

1. The XI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli. Superintendent, Central Jail, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam

2. The District.

3. The Station House Officer, Parawada P.S., Anakapalli District.

4. One CC to Sri. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra

5. Two CCs to Pradesh, Amaravati. [OUT]

6. One spare copy

HIGH COURT Dr.YLR, J DATED:07/10/2026 BAIL ORDER CRLP NO. 8690 OF 2026 c::> ';3f ,-n I tf>'t c.>' /DIS ALLOWED

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead