Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/749/2024 of M. NAGA VENKATESWARA REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 749/2024 Between: 1. M. NAGA VENKATESWARA REDDY, , S/O. VENKATA SURYA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 1 312, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, RAVULAPALEM, DR BR

APHC010658722023

IN THE

WEDNESDA

THE HONOURAB

WR

Between:

1. M. NAGA VENKATE

SATYANARAYANA R

312, VINAYAKA TE

AMBEDKAR KONASE

1. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY ROAD

SECRETARIAT, VELA

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF AP, R

DEPARTMENT,

SE

THULLUR MANDAL, G

3. THE DISTRICT CO

GODAVARI DISTRICT

4. THE CHIEF ENGINE

N.T.R., DISTRICT.

5. THE SUPERINTEND

ELURU DISTRICT.

6. THE EXECUTIVE E

BHIMAVARAM, WES

AMENDED AS PER

W.P.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

IT PETITION NO: 749/2024

ESWARA REDDY, , S/O. VENKATA

REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O

EMPLE STREET, RAVULAPALEM,

EEMA DISTRICT.

...PE

AND

NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P

S AND BUILDINGS (RANDB) DEPA

AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

ECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMA

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

OLLECTOR, (RANDB) BHIMAVARAM

T.

EER, (RANDB) DEPARTMENT, VIJA

DING ENGINEER, RANDB CIRCLE,

NGINEER R AND B, (R AND B)

ST GODAVARI DISTRICT. CAUSE

R THE COURT'S ORDER DT.02.02

RC,J

NO.749 OF 2024

H

ATI

A SURYA

O. H.NO. 1-

DR BR

TITIONER

PRINCIPLE

ARTMENT,

MANDAL,

FINANCE

ARAVATHI,

M. WEST

AYAWADA,

ELURU ,

DIVISION,

TITLE IS

2.2026 IN

RC,J

W.P.NO.749 OF 2024

I.A.NO.02 OF 2024.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing total payment of Rs.

18,05,081/- vide M. Book No. 5880-A, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., (1) Urgent repairs to Gummuluru - Bhimavaram Road from Km 1.00 to 5.00 in West Godavari District, vide Agreement 2023-24 dated 20.02.2023, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 18,05,081/- with interest @ 6percent per annum, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.724 of 2021 and batch dated 12.10.2023 for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs.

18,05,081/- vide M. Book No. 5880-A, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to Amend the addresses of Respondents No.

5 & 6 in the affidavit filed in support of the in W.P. No. 749 of 2024, in writ petition and also I.A, by changing the Respondent No. 5 of R&B Circle, Kakinada, Kakinada District in place of “R&B Circle, Eluru, Eluru District “ and also Respondent No. 6 of R&B Division, Amalapuram, DR BR Ambedkar Konaseema District in place of R&B Division, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District' and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

RC,J

W.P.NO.749 OF 2024

1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri K.Srinivasa, learned counsel, representing Sri Annamneedi Bala Krishna, learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 7th October, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead