Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/2872/2026 of Muddada Raja Gopala Rao Vs Simma Vasudeva Rao on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2872/2026 Between: 1. MUDDADA RAJA GOPALA RAO, S/O LATE SIMHACHALAMAGED ABOUT 57YRS, OCC

APHC010524612026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2872/2026

Between:

1. MUDDADA

RAJA

GOPALA

RAO,

S/O

LATE

SIMHACHALAMAGED ABOUT 57YRS, OCC DOCTORR/O BANDI

VEEDHINARASANNAPETA TOWN AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM

DISTRICT-532421.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SIMMA VASUDEVA RAO, S/O SWAMIBABUAGED ABOUT

64YRSR/O

D.NO.7-230,

BAND

VEEDHINARASANNAPETA

TOWN AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT-532421.

2. POTIURI PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O JANARDHANA RAO AGED

ABOUT

YRS,R/O

D.NO.7-133,

BAND

VEEDHINARASANNAPETA TOWN AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM

DISTRICT-532421.

3. POTIURI KISHORE KUMAR, S/O JANARDHANA RAO,AGED

ABOUT

YRS,R/O

D.NO.7-133,BANDI

VEEDHINARASANNAPETA TOWN AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM

DISTRICT-532421.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.789 /2025 in

O.S.No.52/2018, dt.30.01.2026 on the file of the Judge, Family Court- Cum-lll Additional District Judge, Srikakulam, IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of ail further proceedings in O.S.No.52/2018 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-Cum-lll Additional District Judge, Srikakulam pending disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MOHAMMAD NAYAB RASOOL

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri Md.Abdul Majeed, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the suit filed before the trial Court was dismissed, as such, nothing remains for adjudication and this Revision Petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuos. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 07th October, 2026

RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead