Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/305/2019 of SAYANARAYANA Vs ADILAKSHMI EXPORTERS PVT LTD on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 305/2019 Between: 1. SAYANARAYANA, BANK COLONY, BHIMAVARAM,W.G. DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
APHC010067772019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 305/2019
Between:
1. SAYANARAYANA, BANK COLONY, BHIMAVARAM,W.G. DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ADILAKSHMI
EXPORTERS
PVT
LTD,
D.NO.350/1,
KAMMANGARUVU, AMALAPURAM, E.G,. DIST.
2. MUPPIDI VENU, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ADILAKSHMI EXPORTERS
PVT. LTD., D.NO.4-350/1, KAMMANAGARUVU, AMALAPURAM, E.G.
DIST.
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K L N SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2.
Dr.YLR, J
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order dated 10.01.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.528 of 2016 in S.R.No.1131 of 2016 on the file of the learned II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram, whereby and whereunder an application filed under Section 142(B) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking to condone the delay of 231 days in re- presenting the complaint, was dismissed.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. In spite of granting several opportunities to serve notice on Respondent Nos.1 and 2, the Petitioner has failed to serve notice on them. Without hearing the other side, no orders can be passed in this Criminal Revision Case.
4. At the expense of the Government or the High Court, notice on Respondent Nos.1 and 2 cannot be ordered. It is the Petitioner who has to pay the process fee for the Respondents, as the case is a complaint case. No doubt, a Criminal Revision Case cannot be dismissed for default or non- prosecution, but here is a case where the Petitioner has not paid the process fee. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed for non- payment of process fee in respect of Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Dr.YLR, J
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO,J Date :07.10.2026 KMS
Dr.YLR, J
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 305 of 2019
Date: 07.10.2026
KMS