Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2683/2026 of Smt. Makireddy Satyavathi Vs Sri. Suresh Kumar (IAS), on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2683/2026 Between: 1. SMT. MAKIREDDY SATYAVATHI, , W/O. LATE DALINAIDU, AGED 64 YEARS, R/AT
APHC010339692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2683/2026
Between:
1. SMT. MAKIREDDY SATYAVATHI, , W/O. LATE DALINAIDU, AGED 64
YEARS, R/AT RAMANNAPALEM VILLAGE, MAKAVARAPALEM
MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH-531113.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT
RAJ
SS
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 522503.
2. SRI DR A VISHNU VARDHAN, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HANUMANPET, VIJAWADA-520003.
3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE -
522503.
4. SMT B PREMAKUMARI, DIRECTOR WORKS PAY AND ACCOUNTS
OFFICE, AUTONAGAR, MANGALAGIRI-522503, GUNTUR DISTRICT
OF ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. SRI GAUTHAM ALLADA LA AND AS, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER (CEO), APCFSS, AUTONAGAR, MANGALAGIRI-522503, GUNTUR DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. I.
6. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, THE DISTSRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-532201.
Page 1 of 3
7. SRI V V RAMANA, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARISIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-
532201.
8. SRI
B
VENKATARAMANA,
TAHSILDAR,
MAKAVARAPALEM
MANDAL, MAKAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH-531113.
9. SRI
G
PRABHAKAR
RAO,
THE
DISTRICT
HORTICULTURE
OFFICER,
ANAKAPALLI,
ANAKAPALLI
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-531001.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the Respondents herein and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violating the order of this Court in W.P. No. 15692 of 2024 dated 01.09.2025 passed by Honourable Justice Sri Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao Garu Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO
3. K M KRISHNA REDDY
4. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
5.
6. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK
7. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA
The Court made the following:
Page 2 of 3
CONTEMPT CASE No.2683 of 2026
ORDER:
Both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, in unison, represented and stated that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.
Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 07.10.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2683 of 2026
07.10.2026 KBN
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…