Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18209/2012 of D.Jagannadha Rao, Vs The Chief Engineer, on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18209 of 2012 Bench Sr.No:-44 [3584] D. Jagannadha Rao and others ...Petitioners Vs. The Chief Engineer and another ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 7th October 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

APHC010201732012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 18209 of 2012 Bench Sr.No:-44

D. Jagannadha Rao and others ...Petitioners Vs. The Chief Engineer and another ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 7th October 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Advocates for Respondents : Mr. V. V. Satish, Standing Counsel for APEPDCL LISA GILL, CJ.

This Writ Petition has been filed with a grievance in respect to laying of High Tower Electric Lines and erection of High Tower Electric Poles across petitioners’ land, as described in writ petition.

2. No interim order was passed in this writ petition, which was filed in June, 2012.

3. Mr. V. V. Satish, learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL, referring to written instructions of Superintending Engineer, OMC Circle, Vijayawada, submits that High Tension Transmission Lines had been laid during pendency of this writ petition, in the year 2015 itself.

4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have neither contacted him, nor has he been able to contact them despite efforts, and he has no instructions in the matter.

5. Be that as it may, in the given circumstances, we do not find any justification in continuation of present proceedings, which are accordingly closed, with liberty to petitioners to file an appropriate application in case of any subsisting grievance, within a period of eight (8) weeks. No costs. Copy of this order be communicated to petitioners at the address given in Memo of Parties.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

LISA GILL, CJ

CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J kbs Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable : Yes / No

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN

W.P.No.18209 of 2012

Dt: 07.10.2026

kbs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead