Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10336/2023 of POKURI VENKATESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 10336/2023 Between: 1. POKURI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, CORRESPONDENT, S.C.M.V.N AIDED ELE.HIGH
APHC010199992023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10336/2023
Between:
1. POKURI
VENKATESWARA
RAO,
S/O
VENKATA
RATNAM,
CORRESPONDENT,
S.C.M.V.N
AIDED
ELE.HIGH
SCHOOL,
PRAKASH NAGAR, KADAPA.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY , EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 in not disposing the representation dated 20.02.2023 submitted by the petitioner is illegal and consequently direct the Respondent NO.4 to dispose the representation dated 20.02.2023 submitted by the petitioner and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 in not disposing the representation dated 20.02.2023 submitted by the petitioner is illegal and consequently direct the Respondent NO.4 to dispose the representation dated 20.02.2023 submitted by the petitioner and pass such…”
2. Subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the 4th respondent passed an order refusing to ratify the proceedings of the correspondent.
3. In view of the orders of the 4th respondent refusing to ratify the same, which is under challenge in another Writ Petition, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dated: 07.10.2026 M K K
Writ Petition No. 10336 of 2023 Date: 07.10.2026
M K K