Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3448/2026 of SHAIK ANSAR BASHA Vs JARUGULA SRINIVASA RAO on 6 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3448/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK ANSAR BASHA, S/O.DARIYA HUSSAIN, AGED 61 YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE,

APHC010343482026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3448/2026

Between:

1. SHAIK ANSAR BASHA, S/O.DARIYA HUSSAIN, AGED 61 YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT-

523167.

2. SHAIK JHONY BASHA,, S/O.SHAIK ANSAR BASHA, AGED 31

YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA

DISTRICT-523167.

3. . SHAIK NAVEED,, S/O.SHAIK ANSAR BASHA, AGED 30 YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT-

523167.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. JARUGULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 61

YEARS, RIO. KADAVAKUDURU ROAD, INKOLLU VILLAGE

MANDAL, PARCHUR DIVISION-523167. 2

2. NALLAMOTHU PRASAD RAO, (DIED) 3.

3. NALLAMOTHU SRI LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE PRASADA RAO, AGED 53

YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA

DISTRICT-523167. 4.

4. NALLAMOTHU VASU BABU, S/O.LATE PRASADA RAO, AGED 31

YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA

DISTRICT523167. 5.

5. CHUNDI CHAITANYA SRAVANTHI, W/O.SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 35

YEARS, RIO. INKOLLU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA

Page 1 of 3

DISTRICT-523167.

6. MANGAMURI SOWJANYA SRAVANTHI, W/O.SRIDAR BABU, AGED

33 YEARS, RIO. CHANDALURU VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523214.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful and intentional disobedience of the Interim Order of this Honble Court dated 14.08.2025 passed in S.A.No.566 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Page 2 of 3

CONTEMPT CASE No.3448 of 2026

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Contempt Case with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate authority. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the present Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application before the appropriate authority. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 07.10.2026 KBN

Contempt Case No.3448 of 2026

07.10.2026 KBN

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead