Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/141/2021 of Kanigiri Siva, Vs Tadikamalla Kasi Viswanadham, on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 141 OF 2021 Between: 1. Kanigiri Siva,, S/o. Late Narasaiah, aged 42
APHC010213722021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA
SARMA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 141 OF 2021
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Kanigiri Siva,, S/o. Late Narasaiah, aged 42 years, Occ Business, R/o. D. No. 6-343, Vadde Vari Street, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
2. Kanigiri Velugondaiah, Died
3. Kanigiri Papulamma,, W/o. Late Velugondaiah, aged 66 years, Housewife, R/o. D. No. 3-275, Rajaka Street, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
4. Kanigiri Siva,, S/o. Late Velugondaiah, aged 45 years, R/o. D. No. 3-275, Rajaka Street, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Kanigiri Sadha, , S/o. Late Velugondaiah, aged 37 years, R/o. D. No. 3-275, Rajaka Street, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
6. Kanigiri Umamaheswara Rao,, S/o. Late Velugondaiah, aged 35 years, R/o. D. No. 3-275, Rajaka Street, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND
1. Tadikamalla Kasi Viswanadham, S/o. Late Kasaiah, aged 72 years, Occ Business, R/o. D. No. 7/240, Nehru Bazaar, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
2. Ande Rami Reddy, S/o. Chinna Venkata Reddy, aged 47 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Sivapuram Village, Peddaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District.
3. Chilakala Lakshmi Devi, W/o. Ramana, aged 36 years, Housewife, R/o. D. No. 1/86, 2nd Ward, Narava Village, Giddaluru Mandal, Prakasam District.
4. Bondili Ram Prasad Singh, S/o. Ram Singh, aged 62 years, R/o. D. No. 6-296, 6th Ward, Vadde Bazaar, Near Old House of K.P Konda Reddy, Ex. MLA, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Bondili Surya Bhagavan Singh, S/o. Ram Singh, aged 67 years, Pensioner, R/o. Sivaji Nagar, 9th Lane, Besides Ramaswamy Temple, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
6. Bondili Syam Bai, W/o. Deva Singh, aged 52 years, Housewife, R/o. 7th Ward, Near Porumamilla Vijayamma House, Besides
Sipani Bazaar, Near Sunnapu Batteelu, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
7. Bondili Rukmini Bai, W/o. Srinivasa Singh, aged 32 years, Housewife, R/o. Mohiddipuram Village and Post, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District.
8. Bondili Lakshmi Bai, W/o. Chinna Satyarn Singh, aged 38 years, R/o. D. No. 26-27-31, 17th Lane, Nallacheruvu, Guntur District.
9. Bondili Prameela Bai, W/o. Pedda Satyam Singh, aged 40 years, Housewife, R/o. D. No. 26-27-31, 17th Lane, Nallacheruvu, Guntur City, Guntur District.
10. Mogal Siraj Thulla Baig Siraj, S/o. Sattar Baig, aged 54 years, HDFC Bank Line, Markapur Town and Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondents: PULIPATI RADHIK Counsel for the Respondents: GATTIGUNDE VIJAYAN PRAKASH The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.141 OF 2021 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the orders dated 25.02.2021 passed in I.A.No.628 of 2019 in O.S.No.19 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the VI Additional District Judge, Markapur.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The petitioners/plaintiffs are the appellants herein. They filed O.S.No.19 of 2019 for declaration of title and injunction. In the said suit, they filed I.A.No.628 of 2019, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C., seeking temporary injunction restraining the respondents 1 and 10 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the petition schedule property. The said application was considered and dismissed by the trial Court vide order dated 25.02.2021.
4. No interim orders were granted in the appeal. While considering the appeal for final disposal, learned counsel appearing for both parties have brought to the notice of the Court that the issues have been framed and the suit is coming up for trial.
5. In the said circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of directing the learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, to dispose of O.S.No.19 of 2019 expeditiously. It is needless to mention that both parties are directed to cooperate for expeditious disposal of the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
_________________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date: 07.10.2026 Ivd Whether the order is: Speaking Yes Reasoned No Reportable No Non-reportable Yes
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.141 OF 2021
Dated: 07.10.2026
Ivd