Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3345/2025 of Vissa Jayalakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3345 OF 2025 Between: 1. Vissa Jayalakshmi, W/o Mastanarao, Aged about 64 Years, R/o 10-5, Veeraraghayapeta,
APHC010060552025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3345 OF 2025
Between:
1. Vissa Jayalakshmi, W/o Mastanarao, Aged about 64 Years, R/o 10-5, Veeraraghayapeta, Cherukupalli, Bapatia District previously Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell No 919347327339
...Petitioner
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.
3. Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District, Andhra Pradesh.
4. SubDivisional Police Officer, Repalle, Bapatia District, Andhra Pradesh.
5. Circle Inspector, Repalle Rural Circle, Bapatia District Andhra Pradesh.
6. Station House Officer, Cherukupalli Police Station, Cherukupalli, Bapatia District, Andhra Pradesh
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.4 to 6 in summoning the petitioner to their offices without any registration of crime and involving in civil dispute as illegal, arbitrary and amounts to abdication of statutory duties cast up on them and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 6 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the Petitioner and not to involve in the civil dispute unless authorized by the law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the Petitioner and not to involve in Civil Disputes, pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following order:
Writ Petition.No.3345 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has not disputed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.10.2026 KRK
Writ Petition.No.3345OF 2025
Date: 06.10.2026 KRK