Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3832/2025 of A.SATYANARAYANA Vs M/S..N.V.V. SATYANARAYANA on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010654902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3832/2025 Between: 1. A.SATYANARAYANA, S/O.VEERABHADRA RAO AMALAKANTI, AGE

HN, J

C.C.No.3832_2025

APHC010654902025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3832/2025

Between:

1. A.SATYANARAYANA, S/O.VEERABHADRA RAO AMALAKANTI, AGE

YEARS

,DNO.1-5-39,THUMMALAPALLI

VARI

STREET,

KONDAYAPALEM, KAKMADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. M/S N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER KAKINADA

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY. ,KAKINADA, KAKINADA

DISTRICT.

2. SRI

S

MASTYARAJU,

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER,

KAKINADA,KAKINADA DISTRICT.

3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND

PLANNING

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the responden there in for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 5.08.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.20340/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

2. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

HN, J

C.C.No.3832_2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:06.10.2026 0NKA

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3832 of 2025 Date: 06.10.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead