Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/857/2026 of MOPATI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 857/2026 Between: 1. MOPATI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O
APHC010078972026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 857/2026
Between:
1. MOPATI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O 6-5-165, PITCHI
REDDY THOPU, NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 524126
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, OCCUPATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. SRI SHAIK FAZULLA, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED
NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, OCCUPATION COMMISSIONER OF
NAIDUPETA MUNICIPALITY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
3. A VENKATA RAMANA, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED
NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER OCCUPATION, THE PAY AND
ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, TIRUPATI
DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Sections 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully and intentionally disobeying the Order in final order dated 16.10.2025 in W.P. No. 28515 of 2025 passed by this Honble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.857 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.28515 of 2025, dated 16.10.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 06.10.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.857 of 2026 Date: 06.10.2026
KGM