Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3711/2025 of C P PRAKASAH REDDY Vs Sri PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010638542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3711/2025 Between: 1. C P PRAKASAH REDDY, S/O. K. PEDDI REDDY, AGED 50

HN, J

C.C.No.3711_2025

APHC010638542025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3711/2025

Between:

1. C P PRAKASAH REDDY, S/O. K. PEDDI REDDY, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.6/5/66-1, MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF AP DEPARTMENT

OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

2. SRI B BALASWAMY I A S, S/O. NOT KNOWN WORKING AS

COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under contempt of courts Act, for willful disobedience of orders passed by this Honble Court dated 16.09.2025 in W.P. No.24597 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MARUPILLI SARADA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. P VENGALA REDDY

2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

The Court made the following

HN, J

C.C.No.3711_2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:06.10.2026 NKA

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3711 of 2025 Date: 06.10.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead