Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2676/2026 of V. BALA KRISHNA Vs M. LAKSHMINARAYANA on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2676/2026 Between: 1. V. BALA KRISHNA, S/O. RAMANAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.125/5, KUDIYANAVAR
APHC010358332026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2676/2026
Between:
1. V. BALA KRISHNA, S/O. RAMANAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.125/5, KUDIYANAVAR STREET, VEPAMPATTU POST, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. M LAKSHMINARAYANA, TAHSILDAR, B.N KANDRIGA MANDAL, TIRUPATI
DISTRICT.
2. SRI SURESH BABU, DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SURVEY, R.D.O OFFICE, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
3. SRI RAJ KUMAR, DEPUTY SURVEYOR, B.N KANDRIGA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under the Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for violation of the Order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.29496 of 2025 dated 29.10.2025 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VINOD K REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
The Court made the following:
Page 1 of 2
CONTEMPT CASE No.2676 of 2026
ORDER:
W.P.No.29496 of 2025 was disposed on 29.10.2025, directing the concerned authorities to consider the petitioner’s F-Line applications dated 06.10.2025, submitted for conducting survey, sub-division and fixing of boundaries of the petitioner’s land, by issuing notice to all concerned/interested persons.
2. For non compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has placed on record the proceedings dated 03.10.2026. As seen from the proceedings, it appears that petitioner’s applications were disposed. However, the request for sub-division of the land could not be considered.
4. As the respondents have disposed of the petitioner’s applications, the order of this Court has been complied with.
5. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed. However, if the petitioner is so aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail remedy of appeal under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act and in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.10.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2676 of 2026
06.10.2026 KBN
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…