Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/922/2009 of S. PADMAVATHI Vs THE STATE OF A.P. & 2 OTHERS on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

922 of 2009 Dated 06.10.2026 APHC010424282009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 922 OF 2009 Between: 1. S. PADMAVATHI,

SS,J

Crl.R.C.No. 922 of 2009

Dated 06.10.2026

APHC010424282009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. S. PADMAVATHI, D/O. VENKANNA HOUSEWIFE DEVARAPALLY (V)

RAVULAPALLEM (M) E.G. DT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF A P 2 OTHERS, SHO, REP. BY P.P., AT HIGH COURT

OF A.P. HYDERABAD. RAVULAPALEM P.S. E.G. DT.

2. SEELAM

VENKATARAMANA,

S/O.

KRISHNA

MURTHY

LORRY

CLEANER RAVULAPALEM E.G. DT.

3. SEELAM MAHALAKSHMI, W/O. VENKANNA RAVULAPALEM E.G. DT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K L N SWAMY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

SS,J

Crl.R.C.No. 922 of 2009

Dated 06.10.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred by the Petitioner/Defacto complainant against the Judgment and order of acquittal dated 20.04.2009 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothapeta, in C.C.No.294 of2005.

2. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner.

3. It appears from the proceedings that the petitioner is not turning up for many occasions.

4. This Court, after admitting Criminal Revision Case in the year 2009, directed the petitioner to take out personal notice upon Respondent.

5. On seeing the proof of service, it appears that they are returned with postal endorsement as “Insufficient address” in respect of Respondents No.2 and

3. Petitioner was directed to take fresh steps but, this was not complied with.

6. None appears on behalf of petitioner this day also.

7. Petitioner is the defacto complainant, who is aggrieved against the order of acquittal.

SS,J Crl.R.C.No. 922 of 2009 Dated 06.10.2026

8. Considering the long pendency of the matter, this Court has directed the petitioner to appear finally before this Court to argue the matter. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.

9. In these circumstances, this Court heard the matter on merit.

10. Brief facts of prosecution case are that: Basing on the report given by the petitioner/ defacto complainant the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ravulapalem police station filed charge sheet against present Respondent in Crime No.190 of 2001 of Ravulapalem Police Station. On appearance of the respondent as an accused, copies of documents were served and charge was framed for the offences under Sections 117, 193 and 120 of the Indian Penal Code.

11. During trial before the learned Trial Court, five witnesses were examined by prosecution as P.W.1 to P.W.5 and three documents were marked, viz., petitioner’s report and two other documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.3.

12. Having perused the entire evidences on record and observation of the learned Trial Court in paragraphs No.8 and 9 of the impugned Judgment, I am of the view that the order of acquittal passed by the learned Trial Court is justified. Prosecution could not produced sufficient evidence to record conviction against accused persons beyond reasonable doubt. Thus, impugned order of

SS,J Crl.R.C.No. 922 of 2009 Dated 06.10.2026

acquittal suffers no illegality or impropriety. Hence, I find no merit in the instant Criminal Revision Case.

13. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merits.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated 06.10.2026

KS

SS,J Crl.R.C.No. 922 of 2009 Dated 06.10.2026

Dated:06.10.2026.

KS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead