Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9009/2021 of Chenumuri Srinivasulu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9009/2021 Between: 1. CHENUMURI SRINIVASULU, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O
APHC010155432021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. CHENUMURI SRINIVASULU, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43
YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O KANCHARAPALEM
VILLAGE, H/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT.
2. CHENUMURI ANAND, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O KANCHARAPALEM VILLAGE, H/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT.
3. PALEPU SHASHIDHAR, S/O PARTHASARATHI, AGED ABOUT
48YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLROE DISTRCIT.
4. SURISETTY
ARUNA,
W/O
NAGESWARRAO,
AGED
ABOUT
50YEARS, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR
NELLORE DISTIRCT.
5. PALLIBOINA KRISHNAMMA, W/O MASTHANAIAH, AGED ABOUT
40YEARS, OCC.COOLIE, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU
MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTIRCT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HOME
DEPARTMENT,ANDHRAPRADESH,
AMARAVATI
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE RURAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVVUR CIRCLE,KOVVUR, SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT.
5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDAVALURU POLICE STATION, VIDA.VALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
6. B MAHINDRA, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDAVALURU
POLICE STATION, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent no. 5 in interfering with the peacefull life's and libertie's of the petitioners as illegal,arbitrary and article 14 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the life's and liberties of the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in respect of the peacefull life's and libertie's of the petitioners,pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P NARASIMHULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Sri P. Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they do not have any instructions and as such this matter may be dismissed.
2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 06.10.2026 SSA
Date: 06.10.2026 SSA