WP/5001/2023 of DANDA VENKATA NAIDU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 October 2026

APHC010099132023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. DANDA VENKATA NAIDU, S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT.50

YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURE RIO D.NO.11-1-179-11,1I CROSS,FLAT

NO.393,

HIMA

ARCADE,ARAVIND

NAGAR,ANANTHPURAM

ANANTHAPURAMAU DISTRICT.

2. K. GOWRI SANKAR,, S/O LINGAHAIH CHOUDARY, AGED ABOUT.57

YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURE, D.NO.6-9-1778, LAKSHMIPRIYA

NAGAR, KAKKALAPALLI VILLAGE, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN

3. P. PRAKASH, S/O NARAYANAPPA,AGED ABOUT.48 YEARS, OCC.

AGRICULTURE, D.NO.6-3-338, RAMNAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM

TOWN

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME

DEPARTMENT,

A.P.

SECRETARIAT

AT

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT

AT ANANTHAPURAMU CITY

3. THE

SUB

DIVISIONAL

POLICE

OFFICER,

GUNTHAKAL,

ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, URAVAKONDA UPS, URAVAKONDA

ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUDERU PS, ANANTHAPURAM

DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction mostly one in the nature of a Writ Of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing memo C.No.7549/C1/DCRB-ATP/2022, Date 09/12/2022 as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified, irrational, and Set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspended the memo No. C.No.7549/C1/DCRB-ATP/2022, Date 09/12/2022

issued by the 2nd Respondent and stay all further proceedings in Cr No.318/2020, of Kuderu P.S, Ananthapuram District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. V V ANIL KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following: