Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9635/2023 of PALLITETI NARAYANA RAO Vs THE STATE OF AP on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 9635 OF 2023 Between: 1. PALLITETI NARAYANA RAO, S/o Late Chinnayya Age 60 years, Occ- Attender H.No 7-42-289,

APHC010178992023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

WRIT PETITION NO: 9635 OF 2023

Between:

1. PALLITETI NARAYANA RAO, S/o Late Chinnayya Age 60 years, Occ- Attender H.No 7-42-289, Sangivalasa Colony, Near Community Hall, Tagarapuvalasa, Bheemunipatnam Mandal Visakahapatnam- 531163

...Petitioner

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Cooperative Department, Andhra Pradesh Secretariat,Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh.

2. The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawda, Krishna District.

3. The District Cooperative Officer, Visakahapatnam District

4. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Visakahapatnam District

5. Tagarapuvalasa Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society Ltd, , No- M 180, Tagarapuvalasa, Bheemunipatnam Mandal Visakahapatnam- 531163 Represented by President/Person In charge Committee.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not extending the age of retirement from

60 years to 62 years to the Petitioner as per G.O.Ms. No 15 Finance (HR.IV-FR AND LR) Department dated 31-01-2022 and as per G.O.Ms. No. 15 dated 04.02.2019, G.O.Ms.No. 36 dated 01.03.2019

as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to rise the age of superannuation from 60 year to 62 years as per G.O.Ms. No 15

Finance (HR.IV-FR AND LR) Department dated 31-01-2022 and as per G.O.Ms.No. 15 dated 04.02.2019, G.O.Ms. No. 36 dated 01.03.2019 and direct the respondents to continue the services of the petitioner by rising the age of superannuation from 60 year to 62

years, till the petitioner attains the age of 62 years in the 5th respondent society and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue into the services of the petitioner by rising the age of superannuation from 60 year to 62 years as per G.O.Ms.No 15 Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR)

Department dated 31-01-2022 and as per G.O.Ms.No. 15 dated 04.02.2019, G.O.Ms.No. 36 dated 01.03.2019 in the 5th respondent society pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: CH S V SURAJ

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following order:

WRIT PETITION NO: 9635 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1) It is submitted by the learned Counsel for Petitioner that, pursuant to the interim Order dated 19.04.2023, Petitioner continued in service until attaining the age of superannuation of 62 years and ultimately retired from service on 31.05.2025.

2) The Government has issued G.O.Ms.No.45 Finance (HR.IV- FR&LR) Department, dated 02.07.2026, holding that “the employee who continued in service till age of 62 based on court orders shall be treated as having rendered regular service with all consequential benefits. The pensionary benefits, whatever applicable as per Bye- Laws of such institutions, shall be processed accordingly.”

3) Learned Counsel for Petitioner seeks disposal of the Writ Petition in terms of the aforesaid Government Order.

4) Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for Respondents submits that the case of Petitioner is covered by the conditions stipulated in the aforesaid Government Order.

5) In view of the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing Respondents to process the claim of Petitioner and extend all consequential benefits, including pensionary benefits, in

accordance with G.O.Ms.No.45, Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 02.07.2026

6) No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date: 05.10.2026 SM

WRIT PETITION No. 9635 of 2023 Dated: 05.10.2026

SM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead