Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/8569/2026 of Rukman Seydu Sarthar alias Rukman Hakim Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8569/2026 Between: 1. RUKMAN SEYDU SARTHAR ALIAS RUKMAN HAKIM, S/O. SEYDU SARTHAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,R/O.
APHC010508612026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8569/2026
Between:
1. RUKMAN SEYDU SARTHAR ALIAS RUKMAN HAKIM, S/O. SEYDU
SARTHAR,
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,R/O.
D.N0.13B,
SIVANTHAKULAM, 2 STREET,THOOTHUKKUDI, NEW COLONY, TAMILNADU.
2. UTHAYAKAIYANIRAJ PONRAJ ALIAS UDAYA RAJ, S/O. PONRAJ, R/O D.NO.13B, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS SIVANTHAKULAM,2
STREET, THOOTHUKKUDI, NEW COLONY, TAMILNADU.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Nos.3 & 4
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
Rep
by
its
Public
Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. JESHTADI SUNIL KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 439(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to modify the condition imposed on the Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 & 4 vide common order dated 02.01.2026 in Crl.M.P.Nos.1425 & 1427 of 2025 in Crime No.225 of 2024 of Gopalapatnam Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of offences under ‘the NDPS Act’, Visakhapatnam (for brevity ‘the learned Trial Court’).
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the financial condition of the Petitioners is deplorable and they are unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the ‘learned Trial Court’.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the common order dated 02.01.2026 in Crl.M.P.Nos.1425 & 1427 of 2025 in Crime No.225 of 2024 of Gopalapatnam Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of offences under ‘the NDPS Act’, Visakhapatnam, against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 & 4 is hereby modified as under: “The Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 & 4 are ordered to be released on bail on execution of personal bond for Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
5. The residual conditions imposed by ‘the learned Trial Court’ in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 & 4.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.10.2026 PRA
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8569 of 2026
Date: 05.10.2026
PRA