Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9683/2023 of D N NAGAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 OF 2023 Between: 1. D N NAGAMMA, W/o B.Mahantesh, Aged 39 years, Occ. Unemployee (Previously Worked as CRT

APHC010189782023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 OF 2023

Between:

1. D N NAGAMMA, W/o B.Mahantesh, Aged 39 years, Occ.

Unemployee (Previously Worked as CRT Mathematics, K.G.B.V., Gudibanda) R/o 1/295, Jambulabanda Village and Post, Gudibanda Mandal, Satya Sai District 515 305

...Petitioner

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner, Samagra Shiksha, Vijayawada.

3. The State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha, Patamata, Vijayawada.

4. The District Collector and Chairman Samagra Shiksha, Anantapur District, Anantapur.

5. The District Project Coordinator, AP Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (APSSA), Anantapur District, Anantapur.

6. The Additional Project Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha, Anantapur District, Anantapur.

7. The Girls Child Development Officer, Samagra Shiksha, Anantapur District, Anantapur.

8. The Principal, K.G.B.V., Gudibanda, Satya Sai District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High

Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly 4th respondent in issuing suspension proceedings vide Rc.No.lspl/KGBV/B2/2022

dated

10.03.2022 in suspending the petitioner temporarily and not revoking the orders periodically since from the date of suspension is illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to review the suspension and re- instate the petitioner as CRT Mathematics in any of the existing vacancy in K.G.B.V. in Sri Satya Sai District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to suspend the order of suspension issued by the 4th respondent vide Rc.No.

lspl/KGBV/ B2/2022 dated 10.03.2022 and re-instate the petitioner as CRT Mathematics in any of the existing vacancy in K.G.B.V. in Sri Satya Sai District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M CHINNAPA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR

SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR

SCHOOL EDUCATION

The Court made the following order:

WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1) Grievance of the Petitioner in the Writ Petition is with regard to the action of the Respondents, particularly Respondent No.4, in issuing the suspension proceedings, dated 10.03.2022, suspending Petitioner, not reviewing the suspension periodically and continuing Petitioner under suspension and, consequently, seeking a direction to Respondents to reinstate Petitioner as CRT Mathematics in any of the existing vacancies in K.G.B.Vs. in Sri Sathya Sai District.

2) Learned Standing Counsel appearing for K.G.B.V. submits that the suspension of Petitioner was revoked and she was admitted to duty on 05.07.2023. Accordingly, she joined duty. Learned Counsel for Respondents has also placed on record a photocopy of the letter, dated 03.10.2026, and the joining report, dated 05.07.2023.

3) Learned Counsel for Petitioner also submits that Petitioner has joined duty and is continuing in service and, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated further in the Writ Petition. Hence, he submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

4) Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

5) No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date: 05.10.2026 SM

WRIT PETITION No. 9683 of 2023 Dated: 05.10.2026

SM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead