Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1059/2026 of SUDHAKARA INFRATECH PVT. LTD., Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1059 OF 2026 Between: 1. SUDHAKARA INFRATECH PVT. LTD.,, Flat No.304, Metro Residency, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad, rep. by

APHC010113832026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1059 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SUDHAKARA INFRATECH PVT. LTD.,, Flat No.304, Metro Residency, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad, rep. by its General Power of Attorney Holder Vakkalagada Suresh Kumar, S/o. Subrahmanyan, r/o. 6-19, Naidu Street, Markapur, Prakasam District ...Petitioner AND

1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati - 522238.

2. Ajay Jain, Spl. Chief Secretary, Housing Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati - 52238.

3. P Arun Babu, Managing Director, AP State Housing Corporation Limited, Plot No 11 and 12, Behind BSNL Telephone Exchange, Auto Nagar, Vijayawada - 520007. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P.NO. 31440 of 2023, dated 25-09-2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent No.1 on 01.10.2026, as directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 03.09.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: DHARANI KUMAR B Counsel for the Respondents: RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondents:MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED)

The Court made the following order:

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the bils are upholding and credited to the account of the petitioner today in the morning. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.10.2026 RJS/SZT

18

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1059 OF 2026

Dt: 01.10.2026

RJS/SZT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead