Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/2755/2026 of Bathala Muthyala Devi Vs Yerragolla Pedda Reddaiah on 30 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2755/2026 Between: 1. BATHALA MUTHYALA DEVI, W/O. YERRAGOLLA RAMACHANDRA, AGED 53 YEARS.

APHC010510992026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2755/2026

Between:

1. BATHALA MUTHYALA DEVI, W/O. YERRAGOLLA RAMACHANDRA, AGED 53 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PATHA GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE

H/O. MASAPETA VILLAGE, RAYACHOTY MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA

DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. YERRAGOLLA PEDDA REDDAIAH, S/O. NAGAIAH, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. PATHA GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, H/O.

MASAPETA

VILLAGE,

RAYACHOTY

MANDAL,

ANNAMAYYA

DISTRICT - 516 270.

2. YERRAGOLLA NADIPI REDDAIAH, S/O. NAGAIAH, AGED 66 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. PATHA GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, H/O.

MASAPETA

VILLAGE,

RAYACHOTY

MANDAL,

ANNAMAYYA

DISTRICT - 516 270.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toBeing aggrieved by the non-disposal of I.A. No. 499 of 2026 in O.S.

No. 145 of 2026 on the file of the Court of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, the above-named petitioner prefers this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2755 OF 2026

ORDER:

The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.145 of 2026 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty filed alongside I.A.No.499 of 2026 under Order 39 Rule 1 of seeking temporary injunction C.P.C. The petitioner states that the trial Court having been granted interim injunction Srws 05.06.2026 has failed to comply with the statutory procedure as outlined Under Order 39 Rule 3A of C.P.C. Therefore, it is requested to direct the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the said I.A.

2. It appears that disposal of I.A.No.499 of 2026 is required in the present case. Therefore, the Court below is directed to make an endeavour to dispose of I.A.No.499 of 2026, pending on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 01.10.2026

RMD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2755 of 2026

Date: 01.10.2026

RMD

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead