Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/6766/2023 of Byreddy Karunakar Reddy Vs Sri K.Venkata Ramana Reddy on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6766 OF 2023 Between: 1. Byreddy Karunakar Reddy, s/o B.Siva Sankar Reddy aged about 56 years, occ- Business, r/o

APHC010639142023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. Byreddy Karunakar Reddy, s/o B.Siva Sankar Reddy aged about 56 years, occ- Business, r/o H.No. 1-130-23, Diguvapadu Road Gargeyapuram-518

452 Kurnool Mandal and District

...Petitioner

AND

1. Sri K Venkata Ramana Reddy, District Collector, Tirupati District.

2. Dr Venkateswar Salijamala IAS, District Collector and Magistrate, Tirupati R 2 is impleaded as per court order dated 20.11.2025, Vide IA No-2/2024 in CC No-6766 of 2023.

...Respondents

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein before this Hon'ble Court and punish him for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 16106 of 2023 dt. 3-10-2023, and to grant pleased to receive the copies of the reports of the Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal dt. 11-12-2023 and 29-1-2024 and the order passed by the respondent dt. 30-1-2024 along with the representation dt. 5-2-2024 as additional material documents in the above Contempt Case No. 6766 of 2023, in the interest of justice.

pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed respondent as party respondent No.2 in the above C.C.No. 6676 of 2024, in the interest of justice

May be pleased to receive the ietter bearing Roc. SA/387/2022 dt.

17.12.2025 issued by the Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, as additional material documents in the above Contempt Case No. 6766 of 2023, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: BABUJI TENNETI

Counsel for the Respondents: T BALASWAMI Counsel for the Respondents:SUSHMA YAGANTI

The Court made the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who appeared through online.

2. Perusing the order dated 25.09.2026, the contempt case is closed.

3. Needless to observe that it is open for the petitioner to make appropriate application for certified copy of adangal in respect of subject matter land.

4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J

Dt. 01.10.2026 GVK

Dt. 01.10.2026

GVK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead