Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21774/2026 of Mallikarjuna Kondapaneni Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 21774 OF 2026 Between: 1. Mallikarjuna Kondapaneni, S/o. Subbaramaiah Kondapaneni, Aged about 41 years, Occ Charted

APHC010398182026

IN THE

THURSDAY

THE HONOURA

THE HONOURABL

WRIT P

Between:

1. Mallikarjuna Kondapane

41 years, Occ Charted

Malemarpuram Post, Chitve

516104.

1. The State of Andhra Pra

and Stamps Department

Guntur District - 522238.

2. The Joint SubRegistrar,

Guntur District - 522237.

3. The Union Bank of Ind

Authorised

Officer,

D

Changalraopeta, Visakhapa

4. The Assistant General M

Asset Recovery Branch, Vi

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Y, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

LE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDE

PETITION NO: 21774 OF 2026

eni, S/o. Subbaramaiah Kondapaneni, A

d Accountant, R/o. 1/2, Gurugupa

el Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra

..

AND

adesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, R

, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi,

Sub-Registrar Office, Mandadam, Thul

dia, Asset Recovery Branch (ARB), R

Door

No.26-15-150,

Andhra

Bank

atnam - 530001.

Manager and Branch Head, Union Ban

isakhapatnam- 530001.

...Re

H

D

ELA

Aged about

alli Village,

a Pradesh -

..Petitioner

Registration

Amaravati

lur Mandal,

Rep. by its

Building,

nk of India,

spondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings vide Letter No.Nil/2026 dated 17.07.2026 returning the Sale Certificates dated 13.10.2025 issued by the Authorised Officer of Union Bank of India under Rule 9(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 in, respect of the properties admeasuring 540 Sq. Yards situated in Plot No. 6-74-341-2127-12- C3 of Lingayapalem Village and 690 Sq. Yards situated in Plot No. 7-85-405- 2177-4-K9 of Velagapudi Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, purchased by the petitioner in the public auction conducted under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction contrary to the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, the Registration Act, 1908, violative of Articles 14, 141 and 300A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Supreme Court of India, and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings and direct the respondents to receive and act upon the two Sale Certificates dated 13-10-2025, issued by the Authorised Officer of the Union Bank of India in favour of the petitioner, by filing the same in Book No.I as per Section 89 of the Registration Act, 190

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to receive and act upon the Sale Certificates dated 13.10.2025 issued in favour of the petitioner by the Authorised Officer of Union Bank of India by filing the same in Book No.I as per Section 89 of the Registration Act, 1908, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: P SAI SURYA TEJA

Counsel for the Respondents: V DYUMANI Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS

The Court made the following order:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Having considered the submissions of the respective counsels at length, after physical presence of the 3rd respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2.

Permission is granted.

3.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________

BATTU DEVANAND, J

_______________________

TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J

Dated:01.10.2026

TJN

06

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Dated: 01.10.2026

TJN

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AT AMARAVATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 21774 OF 2026

PROCEEDING SHEET

Sl.

No

DATE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE

01 01.10.2026 DEV,J & GTK,J

This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vide Separate Order) _______ DEV, J

_______

GTK,J TJN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead