Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7262/2026 of MUYIDA DHARMATEJA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7262 OF 2026 Between: 1. MUYIDA DHARMATEJA, S/o Srinivasa Roa, Aged about
APHC010137482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 7262 OF 2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MUYIDA DHARMATEJA, S/o Srinivasa Roa, Aged about R/o Vavilavalasa Village, Regidi Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariate Building, Velagapudi, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Commercial Tax Officer, Amadalavalasa Circle (earlier Rajam Circle), Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. .
3. Asst Commissioner of State Tax, Amadalavalasa, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.
4. Venumadu Venkata Reddy, S/o VenkataSeshaiah, aged about 61 years R/o Area 10-A, East cross road, Gandhinagar, Vellore, Tamilnadu. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: AKHIL KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
NJS,J & TCDS,J W.P No.7262 of 2026 2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Writ Petition No:7262 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: (per Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)
It is represented by Ms. R.Durga Lathasri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the submissions made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________
JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date:01.10.2026 Ksj