Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/8723/2026 of Padarla Devamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8723/2026 Between: 1. PADARLA DEVAMMA, W/O LATE TIMOTHI, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC HOUSE
APHC010518862026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8723/2026
Between:
1. PADARLA DEVAMMA, W/O LATE TIMOTHI, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC
HOUSE
WIFE
R/O
SC
COLONY,
GOTTUGUNDALA
VILLAGE,KONDAPURAM MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, .REP .BY ITS.PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,NELAPADU
GUNTUR DISTRICT.AMARAVATHI.522 237
2. PADARLA KALA, W/0 CHINNA,AGE 35 YEARS. CASTE BY SC- MADIGA,R/O
SC-
COLONY,
GOTTIGUNDALA
VILLAGE,KONDAPURAM
MANDAL,SPSR
NELLORE
DISTRICT.
524228
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court quash the proceedings in CC.NO.201 OF 2025 On The File Of Addl. Judicial Magistrate Of 1st Class, Kavali, Nellore District in Crime NO.
76 Of 2024 On The File Kondapuram Police Station U/S 292 "r/w 3(5)BNS.
against the petitioner / A-2 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense from filling certified copy of
CC.NO.201 OF 2025 On The File Of Addl. Judicial Magistrate Of 1st Class, Kavali, Nellore District in Crime NO. 76 Of2024 On The File Kondapuram Police Station U/S 292 r/w 3(5)BNS. against the petitioner/accused- 2.
Pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all of further proceedings including the presence of the petitioners in CC.NO.201 OF 2025 On The File Of Addl.
Judicial Magistrate Of 1st Class, Kavali,Nellore District in Crime NO. 76
Of2024 On The File Kondapuram Police Station U/S 292 r/w 3(5)BNS.against the petitioner / accused A.2 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. DR G V RAVI
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8723 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein (A2), seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.201 of 2025 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, Nellore District for the offences punishable under Section 292 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner (A2) before the trial Court by submitting petitioner’s practical constraints in attending before the trial Court and states that petitioner shall not dispute her identity at a later stage of proceedings.
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor contended that specific accusations have been made as against the petitioner herein and truth or otherwise of the said accusations has to be decided during the course of trial, hence, there are no grounds to quash the proceedings at this stage. So far as dispensing with the presence of the petitioner, before the trial Court, he has not opposed the same.
5. Since there are specific accusations that have been made as against the petitioner herein, which are all disputed questions of fact, the same can be decided during the course of trial, and this Court, in a petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 corresponding to Section 482 Cr.P.C., would not be in a position to conduct roving enquiry into the disputed questions of fact and quash the proceedings at this stage.
6. In this context, it is apt to note the dictum held in State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Vs. Akhil Sharda and Others1, by the Apex Court in its vivid terms in the following way:
7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein. However, due to ground realities submitted by the counsel for the petitioner, presence of petitioner herein (A2) before the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, 12022 LiveLaw (SC) 594
Kavali, Nellore District, in C.C.No.201 of 2025 is hereby dispensed with, except on those dates when the learned trial Court feels that her presence is necessary. In the event of failure of the petitioner to appear, when the trial Court specifically directs, this Order shall stands automatically revoked, without recourse to this Court.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
9. Needless to state that the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the grounds before the trial Court.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.10.2026 RMR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8723 of 2026 01.10.2026
W RMR