Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2493/2026 of Dr. Bala Eswara Reddy Vs Sri Challa Obulesu on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2493 OF 2026 Between: 1. Dr. Bala Eswara Reddy, S/o Late P. Lakshmi Reddy, Aged about 71 years, Occ Medical Practitioner,

APHC010358922026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2493 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Dr. Bala Eswara Reddy, S/o Late P. Lakshmi Reddy, Aged about 71 years, Occ Medical Practitioner, R/o 101, Sri Mukunda Nilayam, NR Peta, Kurnool Town, Kurnool District. AND ...Petitioner AND

1. Sri Challa Obulesu, S/o not known to the petitioner. Aged not known to the petitioner. Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool-518001.

2. Dr A Siri I A S, D/o not known to the petitioner Aged not known to the petitioner. District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool-518002.

3. Sri Shaik Mohammad Ali, S/o not known to the petitioner. Aged not knownto the petitioner. Chief Executive Officer, A.P. State Waqf Board, 4th Floor, Imdad Ghar, Near Kaleswara Rao Market, Vijayawada- 520001. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish Respondent Nos.1 and 2 for their wilful, deliberate and continuing disobedience of the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.28314 of 2025, under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: ASHOK RAM V Counsel for the Respondents: P VENGALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:SHAIK KHAJA BASHA

The Court made the following order:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.10.2026 RJS/SZT

22

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2493 OF 2026

Dt: 01.10.2026

RJS/SZT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead