Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1739/2021 of Smt. Hari Usha Rani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1739/2021 Between: 1. SMT. HARI USHA RANI, W/O LATE SATYA PRASAD, AGED 74 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING @
APHC010110492021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. SMT. HARI USHA RANI, W/O LATE SATYA PRASAD, AGED 74
YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING @ FLAT NO.201, AMBIKA
RESIDENCY, 2ND LANE, OFFICIAL COLONY, MAHARANI PETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVATI.
2. SIYYADRI SUBHASHINI, W/O HARI NAGA SAI KRISHNA, AGED 40
YEARS,
R/O
D.NO.10-53-177,
LIG-13/3,
NEHRU
NAGAR,
VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to quash all further proceedings in S.C. No.
02 of 2021 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases Under SC
and ST (POA) Act-cum-XI Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court, Visakhapatnam, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim stay of all further proceedings
in S.C. No. 02 of 2021 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases Under SC 8r, ST (POA) Act-cum-XI Additional District 8r, Sessions Judge's Court, Visakhapatnam including her appearance, during the pendency of the above criminal petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. K JYOTHI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. M V S ANIL KUMAR R
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that other two cases filed by the respondent No.2 are already settled, the main accused is husband of Respondent No.2 is no more and as such this petition may be disposed of as withdrawn as there is no necessity to proceed further in view of subsequent development.
3. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. In the result, this Criminal Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 30.09.2026 SSA/GSN
Date: 30.09.2026 SSA/GSN