Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27109/2026 of RANADEER POTLACHARLA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 27109 OF 2026 Between: 1. RANADEER POTLACHARLA, S/o

APHC010486202026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION NO: 27109 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. RANADEER POTLACHARLA, S/o Mallesham Potlacharla, aged about 40 years, occupation private job, a resident of 3-9/1, Sarangapur, Karimnagar, Telangana -505454 ...Petitioner AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, Rep. by its Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi- 110001.

2. The Commissioner of Customs Central Tax Appeals, Office Of The Commissioner of Customs Central Tax (Appeals) 3-30-15, Ring Road, Guntur - 522 006. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topass an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ by declaring the impunged order passed by the respondent no 2 is illegal, arbitray, violation of pricipals of natural justice and consequently set aside the impugned order dated 14/08/2026, condoning the delay of 21 days filing the appeal, direct the respondent no 2 to accept the appeal on merits and decide the matter in accordance with law and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: BASHEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.27109 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Mr Basheer Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with a liberty to ventilate his grievance ,if any in accordance with law.

2. Permission is granted.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for.

4. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 30.09.2026 TM

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.27109 OF 2026

Dated: 30.09.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead