Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/731/2026 of T. Bala Krishna Vs Sri S. Suresh Kumar, IAS on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 731/2026 Between: 1. T. BALA KRISHNA, , S/O. GOPALA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-1781A1, L. B. NAGAR,
APHC010082232026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 731/2026
Between:
1. T. BALA KRISHNA, , S/O. GOPALA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.5-1781A1, L. B. NAGAR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. S ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI-TADEPALLI
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the Respondents herein to attend before this Honble Court and to punish them for their willful and deliberate contempt and disobedience in not obeying and non-complying the lawful orders of this Honble Court dated 01.09.2025 passed in W.P No. 13142 of 2025 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K JYOTHI PRASAD
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.731 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.13142 of 2025, dated 01.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for co.00nsideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.731 of 2026 Date: 30.09.2026
KGM