Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/597/2026 of GAVIREDDY KRISHNAM RAJU Vs TUHIN SINHA, IPS on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 597/2026 Between: 1. GAVIREDDY KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O SRIRAMMURTHY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT
APHC010063572026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 597/2026
Between:
1. GAVIREDDY KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O SRIRAMMURTHY AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF
MARRIPALEM VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. TUHIN SINHA IPS, Occ Superintendent of Police, Anakapalle District, District Police Office, at Anakapalli.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for deliberately, wantonly and willfully disobeying of the final Order dt.20.06.2025 in W.P.No. 14724 of 2025 passed by Honourable Sri Justice Harinath.N and be pleased ip pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T V SRI DEVI
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. A JAYANTHI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.597 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14724 of 2025, dated 20.06.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for co.00nsideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.597 of 2026 Date: 30.09.2026
KGM