Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17063/2026 of ARAVA SURYA THEJA Vs THE UNION BANK OF INDIA on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 17063 OF 2026 Between: 1. ARAVA SURYA THEJA, S/o

APHC010325932026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION NO: 17063 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. ARAVA SURYA THEJA, S/o Nagamani, Aged about 37 years, Occ Bank Employee, R/o D.No. 10/105, Ashok Nagar, Gudur, Tirupathi District. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE UNION BANK OF INDIA, Rep., by its Chief Manager and Authorized Officer, Nellore Main Branch - 3, D.No. 15-196, Gunturivari Street, Brindavanam, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. (524001)

2. The Union Bank of India, Rep., by its Authorized Officer, Brindhavanam Branch, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. (524001)

3. D Kartheek, S/o Not known to petitioner, Age Major, Occ Advocate Commissioner, C/o Chief Judicial Magistrate, SPSR Nellore District, Courts complex, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. (524003) ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned Notice, Dt. 20.06.2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 who was appointed by the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate cum Principal Senior Civil Judge cum

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge at Nellore in Crl.M.P.No. 185/2026, whereby directing the petitioner to vacate the notice schedule premises within 07 days from the date of notice i.e., the residential house situated at Sy.Nos.405 and 406 in an extent of 25 Ankanams or 200 Sq.yards in Ward No. 26/1, Present Door No. 26-15-347, Assessment No. 1031067349 of Kondayapalem area, Nellore Municipal Corporation, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District without considering the EMI's paid by the petitioner pursuant to the notice under section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 issued by the Respondent No. 1 on 02.06.2025 and consequential action of the respondents in not regularizing the petitioner's Loan Account vide NSHL -560541000107564 from NPA category as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to regularize the petitioner's Loan Account vide NSHL - 560541000107564 from NPA category and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to SUSPEND the impugned Notice, Dt. 20.06.2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondents: RANGA SURYA PRAKASH RAO KOLA The Court made the following order:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.17063 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

During the course of hearing of this Court, today, learned counsel for the respondent-bank on instructions would submit that the account of the petitioner was upgraded and the impugned notice has been withdrawn.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.

3. In view of the fact that the impugned notice itself has been withdrawn by the respondent-bank, in our considered view no further adjudication is required in the present Writ Petition.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 30.09.2026 TM

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.17063 OF 2026

Dated: 30.09.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead