Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1124/2026 of Vissarapu Ramu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1124/2026 Between: 1. VISSARAPU RAMU, S/O RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,R/O

APHC010507702026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1124/2026

Between:

1. VISSARAPU RAMU, S/O RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,R/O

D.NO23-10-42,AZEEMBAD,GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM 530026.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI.

2. YADAGIRI TIRUMALA RAO, S/O LATE CHINNAM NAIDU,HINDU

,AGED

ABOUT

YEARSR/O

.D.NO37-12-20/2/1,SVMS

SOUDHA,FLAT

NO

FF1

,KAPPARADA,NGGOS

COLONY,VISAKHAPATNAM,530007

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M. SAPTHAGIRI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present.

Smt. D.Madhavi, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report.

In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Special Magistrate Court VI At Visakhapatnam, in C.C.No.175 of 2017, dated 30.01.2019, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.93 of 2019, dated 23.02.2026, by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 30.09.2026 VTS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead