Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP(PIL)/159/2025 of IMADABATHULA DILIP KUMAR Vs CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 159 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-20 [3584] Sri Imadabathula Dilip Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. Chief Commissioner of Land Administration and Others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 30th

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

APHC010378862025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WP(PIL) NO: 159 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-20

Sri Imadabathula Dilip Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. Chief Commissioner of Land Administration and Others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 30th September, 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Ms Mallavolu Nikitha Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : GP for Home, GP for Revenue, GP for General Administration, GP for Municipal Admn., and Urban Development, Mr A S C Bose (SC for Municipal Corporations), Mr Y Nagi Reddy for R.14 LISA GILL, CJ:

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the facts as narrated in affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.5 dated 29.09.2026 wherein it is stated that house site pattas in question have been cancelled and that disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against the then Tahsildar and Deputy Tahsildar, Machilipatnam, petitioner does not seek to pursue proceedings any longer.

HCJ & CGR, J WP(PIL)_159_2025

2. In respect to allegation of non-disclosure of proper and complete details as are required under High Court of Andhra Pradesh Public Interest Litigation Rules, 2015, including the details of political affiliations and pendency of criminal cases is concerned, it is submitted that same was not intentional but on account of sheer inadvertence. An unconditional apology in this respect is tendered along with an assurance that same would not be repeated in future.

3. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, proceedings are closed. However, in case any subsequent petitions are filed by petitioner in public interest without disclosing complete facts, he shall be liable to pay appropriate cost.

No costs. Pending application(s) if any stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

LISA GILL, CJ

CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J

Vjl Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable

: Yes / No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead