Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/612/2026 of Gudivada Gangadhara Rao, Vs Ch.B.V.S. Bapi Raju, on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 612/2026 Between: 1. GUDIVADA GANGADHARA RAO,, S/O. DURGARAO, BUSINESS, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O 1/91, ULLIPALEM,
APHC010064832026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 612/2026
Between:
1. GUDIVADA GANGADHARA RAO,, S/O. DURGARAO, BUSINESS, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O 1/91, ULLIPALEM, POTHAPAKA POST
MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. CH B V S BAPI RAJU, S/o. not known, aged 55 years. Commissioner, Machilipatnam Municipal Corporation, Machilipatnam, Krishna District
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the contemnors and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contemptof Courts Act, 1971 for their wilful disobedience and deliberate violation of the orders dated 23.09.2025 passed by the Honble court in W.P.No.26137 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MALLAVOLU NIKITHA
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1.
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.612 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26137 of 2025, dated 23.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for co.00nsideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.612 of 2026 Date: 30.09.2026
KGM