Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/8414/2026 of Tatireddi Tulasi Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 September 2026
for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 30.09.2026 Date of uploading : 30.09-2026 APHC010500112026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL
Date of reserved for orders : -
Date of pronouncement : 30.09.2026
Date of uploading : 30.09-2026
APHC010500112026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8414 OF 2026
Between:
1. TATIREDDI TULASI REDDY, S/O. LATE OBUL REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL MANDAL
85 DISTRICT
2. JATPAT DHANUNJAYA, S/O. BALA JAMBULAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32
YEARS,
R/O.
KOTHAPALLI
VILLAGE,
NANDYAL
MANDAL
DISTRICT
3. NAKKA CHENNAIAH, S/O. LATE PEDDANNA, AGED ABOUT 54
YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL MANDAL DISTRICT
4. TATIREDDY NAGESWARA REDDY, S/O. LATE OBUL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL
MANDAL 85 DISTRICT
5. BYREDDY SIVA SANKAR REDDY, S/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED
85 DISTRICT
6. AMBATI SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. RAMESWARA REDDY,AGED
ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL MANDAL
8 DISTRICT
7. TATIREDDY VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O. CHINNA RAMA
SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI
VILLAGE, NANDYAL MANDAL 85 DISTRICT
SUN, J
Crlp_8414_2026
8. SURABOINA OBULESU, S/O. BALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, NANDYAL MANDAL DISTRICT
9. JATPAT MALLIKARJUNA, S/O. KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL MANDAL DISTRICT
10. DERAGULA PULLAIAH, S/O. LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE,NANDYAL MANDAL
AND DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT
AMARAVATI.
2. PATHI GIRI BABU, S/O. PATHI SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 52
YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 29/155-F-BL, NEAR SAMATHA SCHOOL, NANDYAL-518501
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to call for the records in P.R.C. No. 21 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, and quash the same in so far as Petitioners are concerned,
High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in P.R.C. No. 21 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal,
High Court may be pleased grant permission to withdraw the accusations made against the respondents/ Accused Nos. Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9,
SUN, J
Crlp_8414_2026
A11, and A12 in P.R.C. No. 21 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal
High Court may be pleased record the compromise in P.R.C. No. 21 of 2015
on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, against the respondents/Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9, All, and A12
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. K KEDHARNATH CHOWDARY
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
SUN, J
Crlp_8414_2026
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026
In/and
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8414 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
4
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner as well as respondents filed two petitions in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026 seeking permission to compound the offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 342, 506 and 427 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 3 (1) (X) of SC/ ST (POA) Act, 1989.
2. As per the version of petitioner as well as respondents, they settled the disputes out of court at the intervention of elders and they have also filed joint compromise memo which shows that they both settled the matter.
3. Heard the leaned counsel for the petitioner, respondents and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
4. Petitioner as well as respondents are present. Heard them personally. Compared their names and details.
5. Recorded the submissions of both the petitioner as well as respondents. Joint compromise memo shall form part of the record. It is needless to say that in view of the amicable settlement arrived at by both the parties, this court can give permission to both the parties to compound the matter as per the judgment of Apex Court in Jagdish Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another1, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another2, Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab 3 and Anita Maria Dias and Another vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr4, even in non- compoundable cases, on the basis of 1 AIR 2008 SC 1968 2 (2011) 10 SCC 705 3 (2014) 6 SCC 466 4 (2018) 3 SCC 290
SUN, J Crlp_8414_2026
compromise, criminal proceedings can be quashed to save the valuable time of the Court. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 are allowed.
6. In the result, and in view of the settlement between both the parties, this Criminal Petition No.8414 of 2026 is allowed quashing the proceedings in P.R.C No.21 of 2015 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal against the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 & 12 of the offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 342, 506 and 427 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 3 (1) (X) of SC/ ST (POA) Act, 1989.
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 30.09.2026 knl