Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3061/2026 of Bholem Gopalam Vs Vijaya Krishna I.A.S, on 28 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3061/2026 Between: 1. BHOLEM GOPALAM, S/O. BANGARI,AGED 72 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION,R/O. MAKAVARAPALE

APHC010445722026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3061/2026

Between:

1. BHOLEM

GOPALAM,

S/O.

BANGARI,AGED

YEARS,

OCC.

CULTIVATION,R/O.

MAKAVARAPALE

VILLAGE,MAKAVARAPALEM

MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. VIJAYA KRISHNA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ANAKAPALLI

,ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.531001

2. V V RAMANA, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,NARSIPATNAM

DIVISION, ANKAPALLI DISTRICT.531116

3. KAKARA NOOKARAJKU, THE THASILDAR,MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 531113

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971

for wilfully, deliberately and violating the Order dated 14.08.2025, granted by this Honble Court in WP. No. 21539 of 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P NANILU NAIDU

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. K M KRISHNA REDDY

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

CONTEMPT CASE No.3061 of 2026

ORDER:

This Court, vide order dated 14.08.2025 in W.P.No.21539 of 2025, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application dated 06.03.2025 and examine thoroughly and issue orders accordingly.

2. The respondents have considered the said application and rejected the same vide order dated 19.12.2025.

3. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, nothing survives in the contempt case to adjudicate further.

4. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.09.2026 KBN

Contempt Case No.3061 of 2026

18.09.2026 KBN

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead