Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27971/2026 of MUTHYAM RAMACHANDRARAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3624] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 27971/2026 Between: 1. MUTHYAM RAMACHANDRARAO, S/O

APHC010514742026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 27971/2026

Between:

1. MUTHYAM RAMACHANDRARAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/O 3-116 DONTHAMURU RANGAMPETA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 533294

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH- 522503

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533106

4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, RANGAMPETA RURAL PS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533291

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAMIREDDY DIVYA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

Page 1 of 2

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR W.P.No.27971 of 2026

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J. Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader attached to the Office of the Advocate General for the State.

2. This Writ Petition of Habeas Corpus has been filed by the father of the detenues namely Sri Mutyam Veerababu and Sri Mutyam Satyanarayanamurthi.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has obtained written instructions and submits that the alleged detenues are Accused No.1 & 2 along with others in Cr.No.173 of 2026 registered under Section 109 read with Section 3(5) of the BNS of Rangampeta Police Station. He submits that the Accused were produced before the remand Magistrate at the specified time. Consequently, this Writ Petition is rendered infructuous, as the custody pursuant to the remand order cannot be illegal custody.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the same and in view of what has been stated by the learned Assistant Government Pleader based on the written instructions, the Writ Petition is closed. Copy of the written instructions along with the remand warrant shall form part of the record.

5. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J Dt: 29.09.2026 JKS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 27971/2026

29.09.2026

JKS

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead