Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/26644/2023 of THE BRANCH MANAGER/FOREMAN Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 29-09-2026 Date of uploading : 29-09-2026 APHC010514852023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION

Date of reserved for orders : -

Date of pronouncement : 29-09-2026

Date of uploading : 29-09-2026

APHC010514852023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 26644 OF 2023

Between:

1. THE

BRANCH

MANAGER/FOREMAN,

YALAMANCHILI

BABU

RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O. APPARAO, AGED 62, VISAKHAPATNAM

BRANCH,

MARGADARSI

CHIT

FUNDS

PVT.

LTD.,

VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

2. MARGADARSI

CHIT

FUNDS

PVT.

LTD.,,

A

COMPANY

INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES

ACT,

1956,

REP.

BY

ITS

AUTHORIZED

SIGNATORY,

YALAMANCHILI BABU RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O. APPARAO, AGED

62,

BRANCH

MANAGER,

BRANCH,

VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, REP.

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM POLICE

COMMISSIONERATE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

5. THE UNION BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER,

MAIN

BRANCH,

DABAGARDENS,

SUN, J

WP_26644_2023

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

6. THE

BRANCH

MANAGER,

THE

UNION

BANK

OF

INDIA,

VISAKHAPATNAM

MAIN

BRANCH,

DABAGARDENS,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, impugning the action of the 4th respondent Sub-Inspector of Police and 5th and 6th respondents Union Bank of India in freezing the bank accounts of the petitioners Margadarsi Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam Branch, vide Account Nos. (1) 328901010023011,

(2) 328901010023070 and (3) 328901010036673 of Union Bank of India, Visakhapatnam Main Branch, Dabagardens in connection with Crime No. 208

of 2023 of II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam by issuing a notice U/s. 102

Cr.P.C. as the same is contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction or authority and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to de-freeze the accounts of the petitioners Margadarsi Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam Branch, vide Account Nos. (1) 328901010023011, (2) 328901010023070 and (3)

328901010036673 of Union Bank of India, Visakhapatnam Main Branch, Daba gardens by suspending the undated notice issued U/s. 102 Cr.P.C. by the 4th respondent, Sub-Inspector of Police in connection with Crime No. 208

of 2023 of II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. P SAI SURYA TEJA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

SUN, J

WP_26644_2023

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 26644 OF 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they have filed a memo stating that the proceedings in crime No.208 of 2023 of II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam are closed and the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

2. Recorded the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Memo shall form part of the record.

3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J

29.09.2026 knl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead