Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1306/2019 of Prattipati Narasimha Raju Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1306/2019 Between: 1. PRATTIPATI NARASIMHA RAJU, S/O. SALMON RAJU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010426692019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1306/2019
Between:
1. PRATTIPATI NARASIMHA RAJU, S/O. SALMON RAJU, AGED 45
YEARS, R/O. JANAKIRAMAIAH COLONY, RAMANNAPET ROAD, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A. P, AMARAVATHI
2. BILLA SUBBA RAO, (DIED)
3. BILLA SAILAJA, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, W/O. AMARLAPUDI
SRINIVAS RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC TEACHER, R/O. 25-195, DURGA NAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. TALARI PADMAJA, W/O. KRISHNA, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, AGED 37
YEARS, OCC TEACHER, R/O. GOLLAMUDI VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. BILLA SWARNA KUMARI, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, W/O. NELAKOTI
BABU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/ O. HIG NO. 144, HOUSING BOARD
COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. BILLA ANIL KUMAR, S/O. LATE SUBBA RAO. AGED 32 YEARS, OCC
PRIVATE
EMPLOYEE,
RIO.
D.NO.25-195,
DURGA
NAGAR,
NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KUMAR MARPU
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
Petitioner and Respondent No.5 are present. On behalf of Respondent Nos.3, 4 & 6 Respondent No.5 has signed. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 are the legal heirs of Respondent No.2.
Ms. Sudeepti Potluri, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report.
In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Nandigama, in C.C.No.266 of 2016, dated 20.11.2017, as modified in Crl.A.No.455 of 2017, dated 13.12.2019, by the learned XVI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 29.09.2026 VTS