Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27883/2026 of Gandavaram Chiranjeevi Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27883/2026 Between: 1. GANDAVARAM CHIRANJEEVI REDDY, S/O G CHANDRA MOULI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O

APHC010513122026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3457]

TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 27883/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. GANDAVARAM CHIRANJEEVI REDDY, S/O G CHANDRA MOULI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O BATTALAVALLAM VILLAGE, VARADIAHPALEM MANDAL,

TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 517541

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 522238

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 522238

3. THE CHAIRMAN, TRIBUNAL UNDER MAINTENANCEAND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT CUM REVENUE SULLURPETA, ANDHRA PRADESH 524121

4. THE TAHSILDHAR, TADA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 524401

5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SULLURPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 524126

6. DUVVURU SUSEELAMMA, W/O LATE APPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/O AKKAMPETA HAMLET VILLAGE, GRADDAGUNTA

VILLAGE, TADA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 524121

7. DUVVURU HEMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/O LATE APPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O AKKAMPETA HAMLET VILLAGE, GRADDAGUNTA VILLAGE, TADA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 524121

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Order dated 17.6.2026 vide D.Dis(H)/577/2025 passed by the 3rd Respondent declaring the Registered Settlement Deed bearing Document No.5776/2022 on the file of the 5th Respondent as void and null and cancelling the same and the subsequent Registered Revocation Deed dated 5.8.2026 bearing Document No.3651/2026 on the file of the 5th Respondent as illegal, without serving the copy of reports of the4th Respondent, contrary provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and set aside the Order dated 17.6.2026 vide 3 D.Dis(H)/577/2025 passed by the 3rd Respondent and Registered Revocation Deed dated 5.8.2026 bearing Document No.3651/2026 on the file of the 5th Respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 17.6.2026 vide D.Dis(H)/577/2025 passed by the 3RD Respondent and Registered Revocation Deed dated 5.8.2026 bearing Document No.3651/2026 on the file of the 5th Respondent IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to create third party rights either by way of lease, sale or by any other mode of alienation in respect of the subject land to an extent of 960 Square Yards in Sy.No. 53/5 of Graddagunta Revenue village, Tada Mandal, Tirupati District Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N BHARATH SIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS

The Court made the following order:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in future, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 29.09.2026 RJS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

W.P.NO.27883 OF 2026

Dt: 29.09.2026

RJS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead