Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/210/2023 of ADARI RAVI KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 210/2023 Between: 1. ADARI RAVI KUMAR, S/O ADARI APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O
APHC010011162023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. ADARI RAVI KUMAR, S/O ADARI APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40
YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.301, DEEKSHITA ARCADE, MVP SECTOR-1, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI,
ANDHRA
PRADESH.
2. MADAN MOHAN REDDY PULLAREDDY, S/O FAGHUNADHREDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RIO D.NO.7-11-10, PANTHULUGARIMEDA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to quash the proceedings in
C.C.No. 448 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief and pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense the proceedings in
C.C.No. 448 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief
and pass such
IA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No. 448 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate-cum III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam
including appearance of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Sri P.Sai Harshith, learned counsel representing Sri Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter became infructuous in view of Judgment dated 06.08.2026 in C.C.No.448 of 2018 passed by the learned III Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-Cum-III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Visakhapatnam.
2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Copy of the Judgment shall form part of the record.
3. In the result, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 29.09.2026 SSA
Date: 29.09.2026 SSA